Restoring Paxton Creek Watershed StoryMap
Finding the right stream restoration sites in an urban setting can be like repairing an old quilt. You can’t replace the whole thing. And you can’t cut out large sections with treasured, vintage patterns. You can only restore the integrity of the whole by rehabilitating a few clusters of squares with the most damage.
Phase I of the Paxton Creek restoration project threaded this needle of site selection, not only improving water quality and delivering required MS4 credits but also demonstrating that high-quality, ecologically meaningful projects can be accomplished in urban watersheds through the power of collaboration.
Working with PennDOT and the Paxton Creek Collaborative—which includes Capital Region Water, Lower Paxton Township, and Susquehanna Township—RES was able to obtain the rights to implement three separate stream restoration projects on both public and private land, strategically selecting the sites most likely to deliver lasting, successful outcomes.
RES guaranteed the turnkey delivery of over 800,000 pounds of sediment reduction, derived from 5,400 linear feet of stream restoration and five acres of wetland restoration. The projects improve water quality and manage stormwater in the headwaters of the Paxton Creek watershed, which eventually drains into the Susquehanna River and the Chesapeake Bay.
Based on the success of Phase I, additional sites were added, enabling the Collaborative to achieve watershed-scale restoration benefits.
READ NEXT → Restore the stream, restore the valley: Three case studies of watershed-scale restoration in Pennsylvania
Learn more about the project and how this collaborative approach can serve as a model for improving water quality in a challenging urban setting.
Key Takeaways:
- Site selection is critical, and even more challenging in urban settings
- RES helped drive a site selection process including public and private land, working collaboratively with partners
Interested in improving water quality and reducing flooding in your area? Speak with a mitigation specialist on our team →
- Environmental Mitigation (48)
- Video (47)
- Natural Resource Restoration (36)
- Landscape-scale Restoration (34)
- Article (31)
- Species & Habitats (31)
- Water Quality (23)
- Resiliency (20)
- Texas (17)
- Virginia (16)
- California (15)
- Pennsylvania (15)
- Technology & Innovation (13)
- Regulatory (11)
- Klamath (10)
- Research (10)
- Water Quantity (10)
- Louisiana (9)
- Oregon (9)
- Procurement (9)
- Storymap (8)
- Florida (6)
- Presentation (6)
- Case Studies (5)
- Jon Kasitz (5)
- Coastal Resiliency (4)
- Maryland (4)
- Nature-based Solutions (4)
- Bob Siegfried (3)
- Dam Removal (3)
- Large-scale Development (3)
- Mary Szafraniec (3)
- North Carolina (3)
- Studies & Reports (3)
- Urban Renewal (3)
- Bois Darc (2)
- Corporate Sustainability (2)
- Dylan Keel (2)
- Ecological Site Solutions (2)
- Economic Development (2)
- Environmental Restoration (2)
- Flooding (2)
- Georgia (2)
- Illinois (2)
- Indiana (2)
- Matt Stahman (2)
- Milwaukee (2)
- Mine Reclamation (2)
- Mitigation credits (2)
- Podcast Audio (2)
- South Carolina (2)
- Tennessee (2)
- Webinar (2)
- Wisconsin (2)
- Alabama (1)
- Bailey Wilfong (1)
- Brandon Hall (1)
- Caitlin Burke (1)
- Carpentersville Dam (1)
- Conservation Bank (1)
- Data Centers (1)
- Desmond Duke (1)
- Federal (1)
- Justin Freedman (1)
- Kathy Hoverman (1)
- Larsen McBride (1)
- Michigan (1)
- New York (1)
- Ohio (1)
- Patrick Daniels (1)
- Paul Braun (1)
- Robin Bedenbaugh (1)
- Solar (1)
- Suburban Chicago (1)
- Tree Planting (1)
- Volumetric Water Benefits (1)
- Water Stewardship (1)
- Wesley Hayes (1)
- West Virginia (1)
- July 2026 (2)
- June 2026 (3)
- May 2026 (2)
- April 2026 (4)
- March 2026 (1)
- February 2026 (3)
- January 2026 (2)
- December 2025 (1)
- November 2025 (1)
- September 2025 (2)
- August 2025 (3)
- June 2025 (1)
- May 2025 (3)
- March 2025 (3)
- February 2025 (2)
- January 2025 (20)
- December 2024 (10)
- November 2024 (31)
- October 2024 (7)
- August 2024 (2)